1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 617 F.2d
  5. 617 F.2d 1386 (1980)
 

FLORES v. PIERCE

No. 77-2903.

617 F.2d 1386 (1980)

Barbaro FLORES et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Stanley J. PIERCE et al., Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 7, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wilbur J. Russ, Russ & Daniels, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellants.

Robert E. Gonzales and Louis F. Flores, San Francisco, Cal., argued for plaintiffs-appellees; Gonzales, Mitchell & Flores, San Francisco, Cal., on the brief.

Before KENNEDY and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges, and BONSAL, District Judge.

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge:

This civil rights action was commenced in district court by two Mexican-Americans who alleged that officials of the City of Calistoga, California, delayed issuance of a liquor license to them by filing official protests motivated by a purpose to discriminate on the basis of race or national origin. A jury rendered a verdict against the city officials, who now appeal from the judgment against them.

The principal issues here are whether...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases