STATE EX REL. HARRIS v. FUERST

No. 80-1014.

64 Ohio St. 2d 130 (1980)

THE STATE, EX REL. HARRIS, v. FUERST, CLERK OF COURT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 17, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Robert S. Catz, for relator.

Mr. John T. Corrigan, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Patrick Carroll, for respondent.


Per Curiam.

In order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, relator must establish (1) that she has a clear legal right to the relief prayed for, (2) that the respondent is under a clear legal duty to perform the requested act, and (3) that relator does not have a plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. State, ex rel. Harris, v. Rhodes, (1978), 54 Ohio St...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases