NATHANSON v. UNITED STATES

No. 79-2013.

630 F.2d 1260 (1980)

Stanley Herbert NATHANSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Allan Campbell, Individually and in his capacity as Executive Director of the United States Civil Service Commission; Clifford Alexander, Jr., Individually and in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Army; Lieutenant General John W. Morris, Individually and in his official capacity as Chief Engineer, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers; Major General Richard L. Harris, Individually and in his official capacity as North Central Division Engineer, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers; Colonel Forrest T. Gay, III, Individually and in his official capacity as St. Paul District Engineer, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers; William Goetz, Individually and in his official capacity as Chief, Construction-Operations Division, St. Paul District, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers; and William D. Parsons, Individually and in his official capacity as Chief, General Regulatory Branch, Construction-Operations Division, St. Paul District, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided August 12, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stanley H. Nathanson, pro se.

Michael H. Ferring, Counsel, Corps of Engineers and Thomas Berg, U. S. Atty. and John M. Lee, Asst. U. S. Atty., Minneapolis, Minn., for appellee.

Before LAY, Chief Judge, and HEANEY and ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.


HEANEY, Circuit Judge.

Stanley Nathanson, a law school graduate, was, until May 12, 1978, employed as an Applications Review Specialist by the United States Army Corps of Engineers in St. Paul, Minnesota. On May 12, 1978, his employment was terminated without a prior hearing on the grounds that he had shown an inability to accept guidance and direction from supervisory personnel, had failed to properly follow administrative guidelines and operating procedures and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases