PITZER v. DEMIANEW

No. 11,375; CA 14998.

610 P.2d 1256 (1980)

46 Or.App. 185

Jerald E. PITZER and Judy A. Pitzer, Husband and Wife, Respondents, v. Russell J. DEMIANEW and Kathleen Demianew, husband and wife, Defendants, v. Sam DEMIANEW and Loretta Demianew, Husband and Wife, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 19, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. Eugene Hallman, and Mautz & Hallman, Pendleton, filed the brief for appellants.

Before JOSEPH, P.J., RICHARDSON, J., and SCHWAB, C.J.


Submitted on Record and Appellants' Brief January 30, 1980.

JOSEPH, Presiding Judge.

This appeal arises from a garnishment proceeding.1 The garnishees contend that because the plaintiffs failed to comply with certain statutory requirements for a garnishment, the court lacked jurisdiction to consider plaintiffs' claim.2

Plaintiffs obtained a default judgment against defendants. A garnishment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases