BATTENFIELD v. UNITED STATES

No. 77-3274.

648 F.2d 1194 (1980)

Byron BATTENFIELD, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 30, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John E. Lindberg, Price, Tinney, Lindberg & Gianas, Tucson, Ariz., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Donnie Hoover, Civ. Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., argued, for defendant-appellee.

Before CHOY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges and SOLOMON, District Judge.


PER CURIAM:

Byron Battenfield, an Immigration Border Patrol Inspector, filed an action for himself and other inspectors who were employed by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) during the years 1964-69, to set aside the INS interpretation of the Administratively Uncontrollable Overtime statute (AUOT), 5 U.S.C. § 5545(c)(2).1 The AUOT statute permits an agency to pay its employees on an annual basis instead of on an hourly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases