SCHEILE v. FORDYCE

No. 78-2885-E-1; CA 15378.

614 P.2d 1217 (1980)

47 Or.App. 535

Kurt Alan SCHEILE and Peggy Scheile, Husband and Wife, Respondents, v. Elwin J. FORDYCE and Marjorie J. Fordyce, Husband and Wife, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 4, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William E. Duhaime, Medford, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were Timothy C. Gerking and Brophy, Wilson & Duhaime, Medford.

Robert H. Grant, Medford, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Grant, Ferguson & Carter, Medford.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and THORNTON and BUTTLER, JJ.


THORNTON, Judge.

Defendants (vendors)1 appeal from a decree in favor of plaintiffs (purchasers) specifically enforcing an option contract for the purchase of a house, assigning as error the following:

1) The trial court's holding that the original option agreement was orally extended beyond its stated September 1, 1977, expiration date;

2) The holding that the option, if it was extended, was not terminated by written notice...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases