1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 483 F.Supp.
  5. 483 F.Supp. 1311 (1980)
 

UNITED STATES v. AN ARTICLE . . . ACU-DOT . . .

Nos. C 79-2041, C 79-2331 and C 79-2332.

483 F.Supp. 1311 (1980)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. AN ARTICLE . . . ACU-DOT . . ., Defendant, and Acu-dot Corp., Claimant-Intervenor.

United States District Court, N. D. Ohio, E. D.

February 11, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Randolph Baxter, Cleveland, Ohio, for the United States.

William R. Holland, Akron, Ohio, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ADJUDICATION

LAMBROS, District Judge.

This action is the result of a libel of information brought by the United States of America for the condemnation of numerous cases of an over-the-counter medical device called an Acu-dot, as provided for in 21 U.S.C. § 334.1 The American firm that markets the seized devices, Acu-dot Corp., was the sole claimant-intervenor responding to the published notice...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases