WIDOFF ET AL. v. DISCIPLINARY BOARD ET AL.

No. 881 C.D. 1979.

54 Pa.Commw. 124 (1980)

Mark P. Widoff, Consumer Advocate et al., Petitioners v. The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania et al., Respondents.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

October 2, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Walter W. Cohen, Consumer Advocate, with him Daniel Clearfield and Craig Burgraff, Assistant Consumer Advocates, and Ashley Schannauer, Legal Assistant, for petitioners.

Howland W. Abramson, Assistant Legal Counsel, with him Charles W. Johns, for The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, respondent.

Jonathan Vipond, III, for Court Administrator of Pennsylvania, respondent.

Argued June 4, 1980, before President Judge CRUMLISH and Judges WILKINSON, JR., ROGERS, BLATT, CRAIG, MacPHAIL and WILLIAMS, JR. Judge MENCER did not participate.


OPINION BY JUDGE BLATT, October 2, 1980:

The petitioner, the Office of Consumer Advocate, seeks a declaratory judgment that Disciplinary Rule 7-107(H) of the Pennsylvania Code of Professional Responsibility is unconstitutionally infirm as unduly vague and overbroad.

The Office of Consumer Advocate was legislatively established in 1976 as an arm of the Department of Justice to represent consumers of public utility services in proceedings before the Pennsylvania...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases