1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 617 F.2d
  5. 617 F.2d 1149 (1980)
 

ROTHENBERG v. SECURITY MANAGEMENT CO., INC.

No. 78-2631.

617 F.2d 1149 (1980)

Jack ROTHENBERG and Shirley Rothenberg, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SECURITY MANAGEMENT CO., INC., et al., Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 29, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Michael Lamberth, J. Timothy White, Atlanta, Ga., for defendants-appellants.

Herbert S. Waldman, Robert J. Hipple, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before GOLDBERG, CHARLES CLARK and THOMAS A. CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In affirming the instant appeal, we write to clarify two points, one procedural and one substantive.

1. Rule 54(b) Certification.

Davis and Security Management Co., Inc., urge the following as the law of this circuit: "In entering a rule 54(b) certification [Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b)], a district court should include a statement explaining its reasoning for determining [that] there is no just reason for delay." In support of this proposition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases