OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Charles R. Armstrong appeals from the denial of his motion for a new trial. Appellant was convicted of the infamous crime against nature for the commission of an act of sodomy upon a seventeen year old.
Appellant asserts that a new trial is required because the State had not made available for his defense a laboratory report on a pair of underpants worn by the victim showing that no vaseline-type...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.