OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Appellant contends that the evidence adduced at trial was legally insufficient to support his conviction of robbery with use of a deadly weapon.
At trial, the victim testified that while walking down a street in Las Vegas he was approached by a man who identified himself as Mr. Chapple and who offered to sell him a ring or a watch. The man explained he needed money to buy gasoline. The victim responded that he did not wish to...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
