UNITED STATES v. OCAMPO

No. 80 CR 00061.

492 F.Supp. 1211 (1980)

UNITED STATES of America v. Daniel OCAMPO, Theodoro Hernandez, Carlos Cardona, Jose Vincente Otero, Nicholas A. Munoz-Velasquez, Defendants.

United States District Court, E. D. New York.

June 2, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward R. Korman, U. S. Atty., Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, N. Y., for United States of America; Thomas G. Roth, Asst. U. S. Atty., Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel.

Diller, Schmuckler & Asness, New York City, for defendant Ocampo; Martin Schmuckler, New York City, of counsel.

Axelrod & Warburgh, New York City, for defendant Hernandez; Paul E. Warburgh, Jr., New York City, of counsel.

Ira Leitel, New York City, for defendant Cardona.

Edward S. Panzer, New York City, for defendant Otero.

Santangelo, Santangelo & Cohen, New York City, for defendant Munoz-Velasquez; George Santangelo, New York City, of counsel.


BARTELS, District Judge.

This suppression motion raises questions concerning the sufficiency of the evidence necessary to satisfy the legal and constitutional standards applicable to unwarranted arrests, investigative stops, consent searches, plain view seizures, auto searches, warranted apartment seizures, post-arrest statements, and photographic and in-court identifications. Defendants Daniel Ocampo, Theodoro Hernandez, Carlos Cardona, Jose Vincente Otero, and Nicholas...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases