ECHARD v. POLICE & FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT

No. 79-45.

422 A.2d 1275 (1980)

Paul E. ECHARD, Petitioner, v. POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT AND RELIEF BOARD, Respondent.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided May 30, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ken M. Gozur, Washington, D. C. and Andrew C. Bisulca, were on brief, for petitioner.

Judith W. Rogers, Corp. Counsel, Richard W. Barton, Deputy Corp. Counsel and Margaret L. Hines, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Washington, D. C., were on brief, for respondent.

Before NEWMAN, Chief Judge, PRYOR, Associate Judge, and YEAGLEY, Associate Judge, Retired.


YEAGLEY, Associate Judge, Retired:

Petitioner, Paul Echard, seeks review of a decision of the Police and Firemen's Retirement and Relief Board denying him disability retirement.1 The Retirement Board based its denial of disability retirement on its conclusion that petitioner's disability "would not prevent the officer from performing useful and efficient service in the same grade or class of position last occupied."

Petitioner...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases