1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 413 A.2d
  5. 413 A.2d 1271 (1980)
 

H. C. M. v. E. W. M.

413 A.2d 1271 (1980)

H. C. M., Petitioner, v. E. W. M., Respondent. B. E. M., Petitioner, v. D. A. M., Respondent.

Family Court of Delaware, New Castle.

Decided March 10, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerald Z. Berkowitz, Knecht, Greenstein, Schagrin & Berkowitz, Wilmington, for petitioner in first case.

H. Alfred Tarrant, Jr., Cooch & Taylor, Wilmington, for respondent in first case.

David Clayton Carrad, Wilmington, for petitioner in second case.

Charles K. Keil, Bayard, Brill & Handelman, Wilmington, for respondent in second case.

JAMES and POPPITI, Judges.

Separate divorce actions before two judges of this Court require a determination as to whether the respective petitioners are entitled to an order of voluntary dismissal without prejudice over the objection of the respondents.

Petitioner husband H.C.M. filed a divorce action in December 1978 on the grounds of voluntary separation and incompatibility, subsequently indicating that he did not plan to pursue the voluntary separation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases