1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 496 F.Supp.
  5. 496 F.Supp. 1152 (1980)
 

UNITED STATES v. ARTHUR YOUNG & CO.

No. M-18-304 (KTD).

496 F.Supp. 1152 (1980)

UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner, v. ARTHUR YOUNG & COMPANY, Respondent, and Amerada Hess Corporation, Intervenor.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

August 26, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John S. Martin, Jr., U. S. Atty., New York City, for petitioner; Katherine J. Trager, New York City, of counsel.

Carl Liggio, New York City, for Arthur Young & Co.

Obermaier, Morvillo, Abramowitz & Fitzpatrick, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, New York City, for intervenor; Robert G. Morvillo, Roger B. Oresman, New York City, of counsel.

OPINION

KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY, District Judge:

This matter comes before the court on an order to show cause why respondent, Arthur Young & Company [hereinafter referred to as "Young"], should not be compelled to obey an Internal Revenue Service [hereinafter referred to as "IRS"] summons directing it to testify and to produce for examination certain documents pertaining to the tax liabilities of intervenor Amerada Hess Corporation [hereinafter referred to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases