HYDER v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.

No. 15041.

127 Ariz. 36 (1980)

617 P.2d 1152

Charles F. HYDER, Maricopa County Attorney, State of Arizona, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of Arizona, IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF MARICOPA; William Moroney, Judge; Anthony Lack, Real Party in Interest, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc.

September 24, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles F. Hyder, Maricopa County Atty. by Vince Imbordino, Deputy County Atty., Phoenix, for petitioner.

Bendalin, Galasky & Friedl by William J. Friedl and Anthony A. LaRiche, Phoenix, for respondent Lack.


PER CURIAM.

We accepted jurisdiction of a Petition for Special Action brought by the Maricopa County Attorney. Prior to trial, the Superior Court ruled that evidence of polygraph examinations given to defendant would, after proper foundation, be admitted in evidence. The County Attorney objected urging that polygraph results are admissible only if so stipulated by both parties, citing State of Arizona v. Treadaway, 116 Ariz. 163...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases