1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 499 F.Supp.
  5. 499 F.Supp. 1040 (1980)
 

GUTIERREZ v. VERGARI

No. 79 Civ. 3558.

499 F.Supp. 1040 (1980)

Rosalie GUTIERREZ, Lorraine Gutierrez and Luis Gutierrez, Plaintiffs, v. Carl VERGARI, Fredrick Arone, Joel Aurnou, Frank Corollo, Richard Daronco, James Duggan, Leon Greenspan, Henry Gustafson, Wayne Stix, Wallace Haviland, Sandford Lindenbaum, Nicholas Kralik, John Lydon, Alice Stewart, Harvey Lothringer, Patrick McKay, Joseph Santagate, Diva Sagrati, Joseph Rakacky, Joseph Ragno, Ralph Purdy, Jerry Holley, John Ruddley and John Madry, Sr., Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

October 16, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Conrad J. Lynn, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Greenspan & Jaffe, White Plains, N. Y., for defendant Leon Greenspan; Joseph D. De Salvo, White Plains, N. Y., of counsel.

Allan S. Moller, Town Atty., Town of Greenburgh, Elmsford, N. Y., for defendants Henry Gustafson, Joseph Santagate, Ralph Purdy, Jerry Holley and John Madry, Sr.

Carl A. Vergari, Dist. Atty. of Westchester County, White Plains, N. Y., pro se and for defendants Frank Corollo, Sandford Lindenbaum and Joseph Rakacky; Janet Cunard, Asst. Dist. Atty., White Plains, N. Y., of counsel.

Langan & Levy, New York City, for defendant Nicholas Kralik; Michael C. Weiner, New York City, of counsel.

John H. Galloway, 3d, Special Village Atty., Village of Scarsdale, Scarsdale, N. Y., for defendants Wallace Haviland and John Lydon.

Robert Abrams, Atty. Gen. of the State of N. Y., New York City, for defendants Hon. Richard Daronco, Alice Stewart, Patrick McKay, and Diva Sagrati; Barry R. Fertel, Deputy Asst. Atty. Gen., New York City, of counsel.

Wayne P. Stix, White Plains, N. Y., pro se.

ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.

The complaint in this action seeks damages for violation of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1982, 1983, 1985 & 1988. Plaintiffs move for leave to serve and file an amended complaint. Twelve of the defendants have moved the Court, under Rule 12(b)(6), Fed. R.Civ.P., to dismiss the complaint either as it presently stands or as it would stand if plaintiffs' motion were granted.

Background

On June 25, 1974, plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases