HUSTON v. TRANS-MARK SERVICES, INC.

No. A7704-04682; CA 13923.

609 P.2d 848 (1980)

45 Or.App. 801

Donald M. HUSTON, Appellant, v. TRANS-MARK SERVICES, INC., a Corporation, and Kansas City Southern Railway Company, a Corporation, Defendants, and Charles D. Pollard, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 14, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerald R. Pullen, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Douglas M. Ragen, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Miller, Anderson, Nash, Yerke & Wiener, Portland.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and RICHARDSON and JOSEPH, JJ.


JOSEPH, Judge.

This is an action for intentional interference with contractual relations. Plaintiff was employed by Trans-Mark Services, Inc. and Kansas City Southern Railway Company1 (KCS), as sales manager in the Portland office. Defendant Pollard (defendant) was employed by KCS as a regional vice president. Plaintiff alleged that defendant Pollard intentionally and wrongfully interferred with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases