1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 502 F.Supp.
  5. 502 F.Supp. 939 (1980)
 

SENNETT v. OPPENHEIMER & CO., INC.

No. 78 C 1418.

502 F.Supp. 939 (1980)

Morton W. SENNETT, Plaintiff, v. OPPENHEIMER & CO., INC., Ronald L. Brownlow, and Daniel J. Piet, Defendants.

United States District Court, N. D. Illinois, E. D.

October 15, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael B. Roche, Michael P. Mullen, Hubachek, Kelly, Rauch & Kirby, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

George E. Weaver, Chicago, Ill., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

Plaintiff Morton W. Sennett ("Sennett") filed this action in April, 1978, yet nearly 30 months later he is still attempting to frame a complaint that contains a clear and concise statement of his cause of action in compliance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In January, 1979, Judge Bua dismissed the complaint without prejudice on the grounds that it commingled various legal theories in the same...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases