DYCUS v. N.L.R.B.

No. 78-2285.

615 F.2d 820 (1980)

James DYCUS, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, and Joint Council of Teamsters No. 42, IBTCWHA, Miscellaneous Warehousemen, Drivers & Helpers Local 986, IBTCWHA, and General Warehousemen Local 598, IBTCWHA, Charging Parties.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

February 22, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David B. Finkel, Los Angeles, Cal., argued for petitioner; Neil M. Herring, Finkel & Herring, Los Angeles, Cal., on the brief.

Andrew Tranovich, argued for respondent.

George A. Pappy, Los Angeles, Cal., argued for Local 42; Pappy, Kaplon & Vogel, Los Angeles, Cal., on the brief.

Paul Crost, Los Angeles, Cal., argued for Local 598; Reich, Adell & Crost, Los Angeles, Cal., on the brief.

Before KENNEDY and HUG, Circuit Judges, and SOLOMON, District Judge.


HUG, Circuit Judge:

James Dycus petitions this court for review of the order of the National Labor Relations Board dismissing the unfair labor practice complaint issued against Local 598, Local 986 and Joint Council 42, all labor organizations affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America ("the Teamsters Union"). The Board concluded that the charged parties did not violate section 8(b)(1)(A) of the National...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases