LICHTMAN v. NADLER


74 A.D.2d 66 (1980)

Gary Lichtman et al., Appellants, v. Beverly Nadler, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

April 8, 1980


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kavinoky, Cook, Sandler, Gardner, Wisbaum & Lipman (K. Michael Sawicki of counsel), for appellants.

Miles, Cochrane, Grosse, Rossetti & Chelus and Heimerl, Kennan & Stiller (Raymond Miles, III, of counsel), for respondent.

CARDAMONE, J. P., and MOULE, J., concur with HANCOCK, JR., J.; SCHNEPP and DOERR, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the order and deny the motion in an opinion by SCHNEPP, J.


HANCOCK, JR., J.

Plaintiffs' appeal presents a well-defined legal issue: whether owners of residential property in an urban area have a cause of action for private nuisance based on harmful consequences to their property due to mosquitoes and unpleasant odors coming from the natural accumulation of stagnant water on adjoining land. In our opinion, Special Term properly granted summary judgment and dismissed the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases