PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
SCHEB, C.J., and GRIMES and DANAHY, JJ., concur.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM.
On motion for rehearing, appellants earnestly contend that our decision is in direct conflict with Teasley v. Blankenberg,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.