ANHOLD v. DANIELS

No. 45783.

94 Wn.2d 40 (1980)

614 P.2d 184

PATRICIA ANHOLD, Appellant, v. SCOTT DANIELS, ET AL, Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

July 24, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Seth Armstrong, for appellant.

Evans, Quimby & Hall, Inc., P.S., by Janet E. Quimby, for respondents.

Slade Gorton, Attorney General, John E. Lamp, Senior Assistant, and David A. Saraceno, Assistant, amici curiae.


HICKS, J.

Here, we decide if the facts presented support a private action under RCW 19.86, the Consumer Protection Act. At the close of plaintiff's case, the trial court dismissed her consumer protection action stating that "[n]either the evidence presented nor reasonable inference therefrom establishes a prima facie case of unfair or deceptive acts or practices within the meaning of RCW 19.86.020." We remand for further consideration.

Plaintiff/appellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases