CITIZENS AGAINST LEGALIZED GAM. v. DISTRICT OF COL.

Civ. A. No. 80-2087.

501 F.Supp. 786 (1980)

CITIZENS AGAINST LEGALIZED GAMBLING et al., Plaintiffs, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND ETHICS et al., Defendants; District of Columbia et al., Intervening Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

October 7, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Winfred R. Mundle, Silver Spring, Md., for plaintiffs.

William H. Lewis, Washington, D. C., for D. C. Bd. of Elections & Ethics.

James C. McKay, Jr., Asst. Corp. Counsel, Washington, D. C., for intervening defendant, District of Columbia.

James Ostmann, Washington, D. C., for intervening defendant, D. C. Committee on Legalized Gambling.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GESELL, District Judge.

This November, an initiative which has been certified by the Board of Elections and Ethics of the District of Columbia and which will provide an opportunity for voters to approve or disapprove certain forms of legalized gambling is scheduled to appear on the ballot. Those ballots are now being printed. Plaintiffs oppose this initiative, believing that gambling is not right for the District of Columbia. They attack...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases