BLAIR FOODS, INC. v. RANCHERS COTTON OIL

No. 77-3439.

610 F.2d 665 (1980)

BLAIR FOODS, INC., a corporation, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Appellant, v. RANCHERS COTTON OIL, a corporation; William A. Burns, an Individual; and Glen-Webb & Company of San Francisco, Inc., a corporation, Defendants-Counterclaimants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

January 2, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel S. Mason, Furth, Fahrner & Wong, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-counterdefendant-appellant.

Benjamin H. Parkinson, Harvey Leiderman, San Francisco, Cal. (argued), for defendants-counterclaimants-appellees; Philip E. Diamond, Landels, Ripley & Diamond, San Francisco, Cal., Ackerman, Johnston, Norberg, & Parkinson, San Francisco, Cal., on brief.

Before GOODWIN and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and BARTELS, District Judge.


BARTELS, District Judge:

Appellant Blair Foods, Inc., ("Blair") brought this private antitrust action under Section Four of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15, seeking treble damages. Blair charged appellees Glen-Webb & Company of San Francisco, Inc., ("Glen-Webb"), Ranchers Cotton Oil ("Ranchers"), and William A. Burns, Vice President of Ranchers, with conspiracy in violation of Section One of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, and appellee Glen-Webb with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases