PER CURIAM.
This case is before us for the second time. See Rice v. Martin, 136 Vt. 124,
Defendant claims error because of the inordinate delay between hearing and disposition. The delay is, indeed, inexcusable. But, as in Anderson-Friberg Co. v. S. G. Phillips...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.