DIRECTOR v. SOUTH CAROLINA INS. CO.

No. A 7711 15861; CA 15215.

619 P.2d 649 (1980)

49 Or.App. 179

Simon DIRECTOR and June D. Nagel, Arlene Schnitzer and Ruth Heldfond, Personal Representatives of the Estate of Helen Director, Deceased, and Garthe Brown, June Nagel, Arlene Schnitzer and Ruth Heldfond, Trustees of the Testamentary Trust of Helen Director, Deceased, Appellants, v. SOUTH CAROLINA INSURANCE COMPANY, a Corporation, and Industrial Insurance Company, a Corporation, Respondents. Simon DIRECTOR and June D. Nagel, Arlene Schnitzer and Ruth Heldfond, Personal Representatives of the Estate of Helen Director, Deceased, and Garthe Brown, June Nagel, Arlene Schnitzer and Ruth Heldfond, Trustees of the Testamentary Trust of Helen Director, Deceased, Respondents-Cross-Appellants, v. SOUTH CAROLIAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a Corporation, and Industrial Insurance Company, a Corporation, Appellants-Cross-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 17, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David P. Templeton, Portland, argued the cause for appellants and respondents-cross-appellants. With him on the briefs was Martin, Bischoff, Templeton, Biggs & Eriesson, Portland.

I. Franklin Hunsaker, III, Portland, argued the cause for respondents and appellants-cross-respondents. With him on the briefs were Douglas G. Houser, Robert F. Riede, and Bullivant, Wright, Leedy, Johnson, Pendergrass & Hoffman, Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and THORNTON and JOSEPH, JJ.


RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs are the owner and representatives of a deceased co-owner of the Hughes Building in Portland, which was destroyed by fire in February, 1977, and which was insured against fire loss by defendants. After plaintiffs filed their claims, the parties failed to reach agreement concerning the actual cash value of the building or the amount of plaintiffs' loss. Defendants demanded that the disagreements be resolved through the appraisal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases