EXECUTONE OF PHILA., INC. v. PA. PUC.

No. 831 C.D. 1979.

52 Pa.Commw. 74 (1980)

Executone of Philadelphia, Inc., Petitioner v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

June 6, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William R. Deasey, Deasey, Scanlon & Bender, Ltd., with him James H. Johnston, Cohn and Marks, for petitioner.

Bohdan R. Pankiw, Assistant Counsel, with him Steven A. McClaren, Deputy Chief Counsel and George M. Kashi, Chief Counsel, for respondent.

Gerald J. St. John, with him Irving R. Segal, Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, Donald F. Clarke and Raymond F. Scully, for Intervenor, Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania.

Argued April 11, 1980, before President Judge CRUMLISH and Judges BLATT and CRAIG, sitting as a panel of three.


OPINION BY JUDGE CRAIG, June 6, 1980:

Executone of Philadelphia, Inc. (Executone) petitions for review of the order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) which terminated the PUC's own investigation of tariffs filed by the Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania (Bell) and dismissed Executone's complaint which alleged the rates set forth in those tariffs to be below cost, and thus in violation of law.

The subject tariffs proposed rates for three...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases