UNITED STATES v. CIAMPAGLIA

Nos. 79-1269 to 79-1272, 79-1274, 79-1391 and 80-1218.

628 F.2d 632 (1980)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Paul CIAMPAGLIA, Defendant, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. William WOODS, Defendant, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Peter CANESSA, Defendant, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. John GINTNER, Defendant, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Verner BANCROFT, Defendant, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Stanley McNIFF, Defendant, Appellant, two cases.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Submitted March 12, 1980.

Heard May 9, 1980.

Decided August 4, 1980.

Certiorari Denied November 3, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael F. Natola, Medford, Mass., with whom Alfred Paul Farese, Everett, Mass., was on brief, for defendant, appellant Paul Ciampaglia.

Bernard Grossberg, Boston, Mass., by appointment of the Court, on brief, for defendant, appellant William Woods, and William Woods, on supplementary brief pro se.

David D. Patterson, Boston, Mass., by appointment of the Court, for defendant, appellant Peter Canessa.

Paul A. Manoff, Cambridge, Mass., for defendant, appellant John Gintner.

Albert F. Cullen, Jr., Boston, Mass., by appointment of the Court, for defendant, appellant Verner Bancroft.

Richard K. Donahue, Lowell, Mass., with whom Donahue & Donahue, Lowell, Mass., Margot Botsford, S. Stephen Rosenfeld, and Rosenfeld, Botsford & Krokidas, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for defendant, appellant Stanley McNiff.

George F. Kelly, Asst. U.S. Atty., Springfield, Mass., with whom Edward F. Harrington, U.S. Atty., Boston, Mass., was on brief, for appellee.

Before COFFIN, Chief Judge, CAMPBELL and BOWNES, Circuit Judges.


Heard March 12, 1980 (Nos. 79-1269, 79-1271, 79-1272, 79-1274 and 79-1391).

Submitted March 12, 1980 (Nos. 79-1270).

Heard May 9, 1980 (No. 80-1218).

Certiorari Denied November 3, 1980. See 101 S.Ct. 365.

COFFIN, Chief Judge.

In January of 1979, after a lengthy investigation, the grand jury returned indictments charging appellants and others with conspiracy to commit mail fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 371, (Count 1) and ten instances of mail...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases