1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 496 F.Supp.
  5. 496 F.Supp. 751 (1980)
 

CITY OF ROCHESTER v. U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL, ETC.

Civ. No. 3-80-460.

496 F.Supp. 751 (1980)

CITY OF ROCHESTER, a municipal corporation of the State of Minnesota; Paul A. Laurence Company, a Minnesota corporation; VanKnight Steel Erection, Inc., a Minnesota corporation; and Lopez, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; and John C. McGuire as Administrator of Region V of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and not personally, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Third Division.

August 27, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frederick S. Suhler, Jr., City Atty., Rochester, Minn., for plaintiff City of Rochester.

Martin G. Weinstein, William Z. Pentelovich and Rebecca A. Palmer, Maslon, Edelman, Borman, Brand & McNulty, Minneapolis, Minn., for plaintiffs Paul A. Laurence Company, VanKnight Steel Erection, Inc., and Lopez, Inc.

Theodore Davis, Minneapolis, Minn., for plaintiff Paul A. Laurence Company.

Christopher L. Rissetto, Walstad, Kasimer, Tansey & Ittig, Washington, D. C., for Paul A. Laurence Co., and The Woodbury Blair Mansion.

Thomas Berg, U. S. Atty. by Stephen G. Palmer, Asst. U. S. Atty., Minneapolis, Minn., Stephen M. Sorett, Washington, D. C., and Robert M. Andersen, Chicago, Ill., for the United States Environmental Protection Agency and John C. McGuire.

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER FOR JUDGMENT

RENNER, District Judge.

The above-entitled matter came before the undersigned on August 14, 1980, pursuant to Rule 65(a)(2), Fed.R.Civ.P., and the Temporary Restraining Order entered by this Court on August 4, 1980, for consolidated hearing of plaintiffs' application for preliminary injunction together with trial on the merits of plaintiffs' complaint.

Based upon all the files, records,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases