____, A MINOR v. JUVENILE DEPARTMENT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

No. 11667.

611 P.2d 624 (1980)

____, A MINOR, Appellant, v. JUVENILE DEPARTMENT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

June 4, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Puccinelli & Puccinelli, Elko, for appellant.

Thomas L. Stringfield, Dist. Atty., Elko County, and Richard J. Jost, Deputy Dist. Atty., Elko, for respondent.


OPINION ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM:

In A Minor v. Juvenile Department, 96 Nev. ___, 608 P.2d 509 (1980), we held that the accomplice corroboration rule was applicable to juvenile delinquency proceedings. Rehearing was granted for the limited purpose of deciding whether that application is foreclosed by NRS 169.025.1

The Legislature has dictated, by enacting NRS 169.025, that our criminal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases