1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 606 P.2d
  5. 606 P.2d 628 (1980)
 

BARBOUR v. PECK

No. 184-416; CA 15771.

606 P.2d 628 (1980)

44 Or.App. 363

Phillip C. BARBOUR and Lois Barbour, Appellants, v. Gerald C. PECK and Martin Peck, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 11, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul Robeck, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. On the brief was Gary M. Bullock, Portland.

Katherine H. O'Neil, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With her on the brief were Ancer L. Haggerty, Ridgway K. Foley, Jr., and Souther, Spaulding, Kinsey, Williamson & Schwabe, Portland.

Before JOSEPH, P.J., and LEE and RICHARDSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment in a property damage action after a trial to the court. One assignment of error is raised without any attempt to comply with Rule 25.10, Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Rules of Appellate Procedure, and will not be considered. Further, we are asked to reverse a judgment because of insufficiency of the evidence, but plaintiffs failed to raise that matter at trial. Baldwin v. Miller, 44 Or.App. 371,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases