A complaint should not be dismissed under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 12(b)(6), for failure to state a claim unless plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief. Sutton v. Duke,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
SCHLOSS OUTDOOR ADVER. v. CITY OF CHARLOTTE
272 S.E.2d 920 (1980)
SCHLOSS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. The CITY OF CHARLOTTE, A Municipal Corporation, Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff, v. GODLEY REALTY COMPANY, Third Party Defendant.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 16, 1980.
December 16, 1980.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Deputy City. Atty. H. Michael Boyd, Charlotte, for defendant-appellee, City of Charlotte.
Horack, Talley, Pharr & Lowndes by Robert C. Stephens and Thomas J. Ashcraft, Charlotte, for third party defendant-appellee.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.