SPRINGFIELD ED. ASS'N v. SPRINGFIELD, ETC.

CA 12102; SC 26542.

621 P.2d 547 (1980)

290 Or. 217

SPRINGFIELD EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, v. SPRINGFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 19 AND EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD, Respondents, and School District No. 1, Multnomah County, and Oregon School Boards Association, Intervenors. Eugene Education Association, Petitioner, v. EUGENE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 4J, and Employment Relations Board, Respondents, and School District No. 1, Multnomah County, and Oregon School Boards Association, Intervenors. South Lane Education Association, Petitioner, v. SOUTH LANE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 45J3, and Employment Relations Board, Respondents, and School District No. 1, Multnomah County, and Oregon School Boards Association, Intervenors.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided December 16, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jennifer Friesen and Henry H. Drummonds, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioners. With them on the petition was Kulongoski, Heid, Durham & Drummonds, Eugene. On the briefs was Henry H. Drummonds of Kulongoski, Heid, Durham & Drummonds, Eugene.

Bruce E. Smith, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent school districts. With him on the briefs were Moore, Wurtz & Logan, Springfield; Gary R. Ackley of Ackley & Kelsay, Cottage Grove; Young, Horn, Cass & Scott, Eugene; and Richard E. Miller of Hershner, Hunter, Miller, Moulton & Andrews, Eugene.

Mark C. McClanahan, Portland, argued the cause for intervenors. With him on respondent school districts' briefs were Edward C. Harms, Jr., of Harms & Harold, Springfield; and Miller, Anderson, Nash, Yerke & Wiener, Portland, attorneys for intervenors.

James A. Redden, Atty. Gen., and Al J. Laue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, waived appearance for respondent Employment Relations Bd.

Before DENECKE, C.J., and TONGUE, HOWELL, LENT, PETERSON and TANZER, JJ.


TANZER, Judge.

These three consolidated contested cases originated six years ago in unfair labor practices complaints against three school districts filed with the Employment Relations Board (ERB) by complainants, three teachers' labor organizations. The complaints charged the school districts with unfair labor practices by refusal to bargain regarding some 92 proposals, including proposals regarding teacher evaluation. There have been two ERB orders and three Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases