1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 497 F.Supp.
  5. 497 F.Supp. 661 (1980)
 

HERCULES INC. v. EXXON CORP.

Civ. A. No. 3439.

497 F.Supp. 661 (1980)

HERCULES INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. EXXON CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

July 29, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David F. Anderson of Potter, Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, Del., for plaintiff; Caspar C. Schneider, Jr., Stanley L. Amberg, William J. Hone, Richard P. Ferrara, and Deborah A. Brandstater of Davis, Hoxie, Faithfull & Hapgood, New York City, of counsel.

Arthur G. Connolly, Jr. of Connolly, Bove & Lodge, Wilmington, Del., for defendant; Thomas F. Reddy, Jr., Berj A. Terzian, Jonathan A. Marshall, and Ronald A. Bleeker of Pennie & Edmonds, New York City, Lee Chasan of Exxon Chemical Co., of counsel.

OPINION

CALEB M. WRIGHT, Senior District Judge.

In this action, Hercules Incorporated ("Hercules") charges Exxon Corporation ("Exxon")1 with infringing both literally and under the Doctrine of Equivalents, United States Patent 3,211,709 which covers a form of sulfur-vulcanizable ethylene propylene terpolymers ("EPT's") useful as synthetic rubbers.2 Hercules's interest in this patent arises by virtue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases