STATE EX REL. EDMISTEN v. ZIM CHEMICAL CO.

No. 7910SC636.

263 S.E.2d 849 (1980)

STATE of North Carolina ex rel. Rufus L. EDMISTEN, Attorney General v. ZIM CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC., Melvin Tillem, President; Thomas Noland, Sales Manager; Jerry Wease, Salesman.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

As Corrected May 5, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen. John R. B. Matthis and Asst. Atty. Gen. Alan S. Hirsch, Raleigh, for the State.

Bailey, Dixon, Wooten, McDonald & Fountain by Kenneth Wooten, Jr. and Gary S. Parsons, Raleigh, for defendant Zim Chemical Company, Inc.


HARRY C. MARTIN, Judge.

Defendant Zim's first assignment of error is the trial court's granting the state's motion for summary judgment after finding that no genuine issue of material fact was in dispute as to Zim's liability. Zim argues that because it specifically denied the state's allegations of misrepresentation of the antifreeze and presented affidavits contradicting those offered by the state to support the allegations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases