1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 261 S.E.2d
  5. 261 S.E.2d 839 (1980)
 

STATE v. SAULTS

No. 78.

261 S.E.2d 839 (1980)

299 N.C. 319

STATE of North Carolina v. Franklin Junior SAULTS.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 1, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Goldsmith & Goldsmith by C. Frank Goldsmith, Jr., Marion, for defendant.

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Gen. Douglas A. Johnston, Raleigh, for the State.

COPELAND, Justice.

Defendant contends that the findings of fact made by the trial judge do not support his conclusion of law. We agree.

Findings of fact are binding and are conclusive on appeal when they are supported by competent evidence. State v. Stepney, 280 N.C. 306, 185 S.E.2d 844 (1972); State v. Hedgebeth, 228 N.C. 259...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases