McNAUGHTON v. IMM. & NAT. SERVICE

No. 78-2927.

612 F.2d 457 (1980)

Andrew Robert Leslie McNAUGHTON, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied February 11, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen Tornay, San Diego, Cal., for petitioner.

Robert Kendall, Jr., Washington, D.C. (argued), for respondent; Philip Wilens, James P. Morris, Michael J. Beck, Washington, D.C., on brief.

Before CHOY, ANDERSON and HUG, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

McNaughton petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) finding him deportable on the ground that he was excludable at the time of entry because he had been convicted by a Canadian court of a crime involving moral turpitude. McNaughton contends that neither the crime nor the conduct upon which the conviction was based involved moral turpitude and that, therefore, he was not excludable. We affirm the decision of the BIA....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases