Plaintiff's attempt to recover damages allegedly caused by a wrongful attachment granted during the course of a replevin action commenced by defendant must be rejected. Although it was decided that defendant was not entitled to an attachment in that action, the damages allegedly sustained by plaintiff were not proximately caused "by reason of the attachment" (CPLR 6212, subd [e]) since the court had ordered that the Sheriff retain possession of the merchandise until further...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
