1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 264 S.E.2d
  5. 264 S.E.2d 790 (1980)
 

STATE v. HARRIS

No. 7915SC910.

264 S.E.2d 790 (1980)

STATE of North Carolina v. William Allen HARRIS.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

April 15, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Gen. Jo Anne Sanford, Raleigh, for the State.

Gunn & Messick by Robert L. Gunn, Pittsboro, for defendant-appellant.

HARRY C. MARTIN, Judge.

Defendant contends his incriminating statements to the officers were incompetent. The evidence shows an officer advised defendant of his constitutional rights pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), and he signed a written waiver before making any statements. The defendant also made two inconsistent statements to another officer, Charles Hinton. Although Officer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases