1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 606 P.2d
  5. 606 P.2d 441 (1980)
 

RUFF v. KEZER

No. 79SA256.

606 P.2d 441 (1980)

Margaret RUFF, Betty J. Baker, Mary A. Beer, Cheryl J. Crum, Beverly Ditolla, Esther L. Harris, Camilla L. Gallegos, Kathleen M. McDowell, Christine L. Miller, Rose Mary Sedlmayer, Rose Marie Serna, Mark E. Shugarts, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. John KEZER, Director, Division of Labor, Department of Labor and Employment, Industrial Commission of Colorado, Communication Workers of America, a labor organization, the Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Company, a corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

Rehearing Denied February 25, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Burnett, Horan & Hilgers, Mike Hilgers, Don D. Jacobson, Denver, for plaintiffs-appellants; Hugh L. Reilly, National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Inc., Fairfax, Va., of counsel.

J. D. MacFarlane, Atty. Gen., Richard F. Hennessey, Deputy Atty. Gen., Mary J. Mullarkey, Sol. Gen., Joel W. Cantrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for defendant-appellee John Kezer, Director, Division of Labor, Dept. of Labor and Employment.

David R. Hansen, Denver, for defendant-appellee The Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Co.

McKendree & Lubin, John W. McKendree, Clay R. Smith, Denver, for defendant-appellee Communication Workers of America; Charles V. Koons, Kane & Koons, Washington, D. C., of counsel.

DUBOFSKY, Justice.

Plaintiffs-Appellants seek review of a district court summary judgment order denying their request for injunctive relief to prevent the defendants John Kezer, Director of the Colorado Division of Labor, Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company (Mountain Bell), and Communication Workers of America (CWA), an unincorporated labor association, from implementing an "all-union agreement"

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases