1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 621 F.2d
  5. 621 F.2d 421 (1980)
 

ARSHAL v. UNITED STATES

No. 431-75.

621 F.2d 421 (1980)

George ARSHAL v. The UNITED STATES.

United States Court of Claims.

March 19, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George Arshal, pro se.

Joseph A. Hill, Washington, D. C., with whom was Asst. Atty. Gen. Alice Daniel, Washington, D. C., for defendant Charles D. B. Curry, San Francisco, Cal. and Frank G. Nieman, Arlington, Va., of counsel.

Before KASHIWA, KUNZIG and BENNETT, Judges.

ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION AND PLAINTIFF'S CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff sues the United States for patent infringement, within our jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1498 (1976). The case is before us on plaintiff's exception to the recommended decision submitted by Trial Judge Browne under Rule 54(a). The trial judge concluded that plaintiff's patent was invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (1976) but denied defendant's motion for patent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases