COM. v. MUMMA


489 Pa. 547 (1980)

414 A.2d 1026

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Harold Paul MUMMA, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided May 30, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas G. Klingensmith, Lancaster, for appellant.

Richard A. Sheetz, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., Lancaster, for appellee.

Before EAGEN, C.J., and O'BRIEN, ROBERTS, NIX, LARSEN and FLAHERTY, JJ.


OPINION OF THE COURT

ROBERTS, Justice.

This case presents a question of whether the Commonwealth introduced sufficient evidence at appellant's trial to satisfy the requirements of Pennsylvania's indecent assault statute, 18 Pa.C.S. § 3126. Appellant, eighteen year old Harold Mumma, claims he did not know his contact with the victim, Mark Belesfield, was offensive and did not know the victim was unaware that an indecent contact occurred. We conclude...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases