HAVILAND v. LAND CONSERVATION AND DEV. COM'N

No. 78-012; CA 13638.

609 P.2d 423 (1980)

45 Or.App. 761

Paul and Ruth HAVILAND, Karl Clinkinbeard, Anthony and Anne Boitano, and Nora Bottjer, Petitioners, v. LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OREGON, the City of Medford, and Jackson County, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 14, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard A. Stark, Medford, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioners.

Al J. Laue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent Land Conservation and Development Commission. With him on the brief were James A. Redden, Atty. Gen., and Walter L. Barrie, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Eugene F. Hart, Jr., Medford, filed the brief for respondent City of Medford.

Thomas J. Owens, Medford, filed the brief for respondent Jackson County.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and GILLETTE and ROBERTS, JJ.


BUTTLER, Presiding Judge.

Petitioners appeal from an order of the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC or Commission) in which that agency concluded that the City of Medford and Jackson County had not violated statewide planning goals in establishing the urban growth boundaries of Medford which excluded petitioners' property.

In Spring, 1978, the city and county amended their comprehensive plans, which have not yet been acknowledged by LCDC,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases