Judgment affirmed.
The trial court's use at sentencing of an aphorism ascribed to a religious work in describing the allegedly predatory characteristics evinced by this defendant was not an establishment of religion by the State in violation of the Federal or State Constitutions (see, e.g., Committee for Public Educ. v Nyquist,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.