PEACOCK v. BRYANT

No. CA 80-23.

600 S.W.2d 413 (1980)

Charles PEACOCK, Jr., et ux., Appellants, v. Daniel C. BRYANT et ux., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas.

Rehearing Denied June 25, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joe N. Peacock, McCrory, for appellants.

Owens, McHaney & Calhoun by John C. Calhoun, Jr., Little Rock, for appellees.


Released for Publication by the Court of Appeals.

NEWBERN, Judge.

In this case an action was brought seeking reformation of an instrument which embodied a contract for the sale of farm property. The chancellor held that the instrument was not ambiguous and that he could find "no fraud and no mistake of a type supporting reformation." The appellant asks us to reverse, saying the chancellor erred in his finding "the contract was not ambiguous." While we agree...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases