TOWN OF NOTTINGHAM v. HARVEY

Nos. 79-274, 79-275 and 79-464.

120 N.H. 889 (1980)

TOWN OF NOTTINGHAM v. DANIEL HARVEY & a. TOWN OF NOTTINGHAM v. LEE HOMES, INC. & a.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

December 29, 1980.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sulloway, Hollis & Soden, of Concord (Peter F. Imse orally), for the plaintiff (Town of Nottingham, 79-274).

Shute, Engel & Frasier, of Exeter (David C. Engel orally), for the plaintiff (Town of Nottingham, 79-275, 79-464).

Barrett & McNeill, of Durham (John T. Barrett orally), for the defendants.


PER CURIAM.

The validity of the Town of Nottingham zoning ordinance and subdivision regulations is the issue presented by the defendant Harvey's appeal. The town alleges that Harvey has violated both the zoning ordinance and the subdivision regulations by conveying subdivided lots of his property to his children. The Superior Court (Randall, J.) found that the town had validly adopted the ordinance and subdivision regulations and declared the conveyances void...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases