Judgment affirmed.
There is no need to resolve the question of when the prosecutor should have apprised defendant of the existence of "twenty something" additional tapes, since the fact is that (as shown in the voir dire transcripts) defense counsel, after having conducted his voir dire of the jury, was apprised of the additional tapes and was given an opportunity — which he utilized — to examine them. Prejudice might have resulted...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
