Judgment affirmed.
In our opinion, there was probable cause for the defendant's detention on September 14, 1976. Consequently, there is no basis for the claim that his confession and incriminating oral statements of that day should have been suppressed because they were the "fruit" of an unlawful arrest (see, generally, Brown v Illinois,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
