1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 609 F.2d
  5. 609 F.2d 383 (1979)
 

RICHMOND ELKS HALL ASS'N v. RICHMOND, ETC.

No. 77-2594.

609 F.2d 383 (1979)

RICHMOND ELKS HALL ASSOCIATION, a California corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RICHMOND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

December 6, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William R. Edgar, Fitzgerald, Berg & Edgar, Burlingame, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Ronald J. Mulcare, Turner & Mulcare, San Mateo, Cal., argued for plaintiff-appellee; Jeffrey D. Polisner, Bold & Polisner, Walnut Creek, Cal., Turner, Mulcare & Whitaker, San Mateo, Cal., Jackson & Gughemetti, Burlingame, Cal., on the brief.

Before ANDERSON and HUG, Circuit Judges, and PORT, Senior District Judge.

J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:

The Richmond Redevelopment Agency (Agency) appeals an award to the Richmond Elks Hall Association (Elks) of litigation expenses arising from an inverse condemnation action which Elks successfully prosecuted against the Agency in 1974. On appeal, we affirmed the judgment awarding compensation to Elks, and also affirmed against Elks' cross-appeal a denial of litigation expenses. Richmond Elks Hall Association v. Richmond Redevelopment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases